Posts Tagged ‘Poverty Level’

The Downside of Public School Rankings

January 4th, 2010

Any parent or educator knows that rating students and their schools is a big deal. State standards of learning, No Child Left Behind mandates, and independent websites all have their ways of evaluating the nation’s schools and children. There are some valid reasons behind this. The schools in our country are in sad and sorry shape. Economic status has more impact on a child’s future than any other factor. So public school rankings have emerged as part of an overall attempt to identify failing schools and help them improve.

So why are so many teachers and parents up in arms about testing? There are a lot of reasons.

The Inequities of Testing and Public school rankings

The fairness of testing, and ultimately public school rankings, has always been a controversial topic. Advocates claim that it’s the only way to keep schools accountable; and they say that the students who fail do so because they just aren’t ready to pass. Opponents of testing based public school rankings say that misses the point completely. If many students aren’t ready to pass it’s because their poverty level schools don’t give them the skills they need. And they claim that the rankings paint these schools in a bad light, which makes the situation worse. When fewer children choose to attend poorly rated schools the schools then lose money based on per pupil funding. So what’s the real deal?

Having taught in the inner city for years, the truths aren’t anything that anyone really wants to hear. Public school rankings give parents a basis for evaluating their children’s school, and for making educated decisions on moving. Politicians also love public school rankings for gen interest because they can make the numbers fit their story. But no public school rankings can tell the complete story of inner city education.

The sad truth is that money buys education in a lot of ways. Parents who are forced to work two jobs have a lot less time and energy to devote to their children’s schooling. Kids whose parents are in and out of prison, on drugs, or living in the dangerous housing projects usually have other concerns above academics. And the best teachers often choose not to teach in the poorest schools because it’s dangerous, supplies are scarce, parent involvement is minimal, and the schools often have a lack of leadership and vision. The public school rankings are often right on target in these situations.

Where Public school rankings Fall Short

Here’s what they miss. Public school rankings rely heavily on demographics and standardized tests. Standardized tests are one small part of the overall picture of a school and student’s success. A school that does a great job educating students with special needs or English Language Learners will have far worse test scores than schools with small numbers of these populations. Public school rankings also fail to mark current progress, improvements and initiatives in a school. Changes in school leadership can also have a drastic effect on public school rankings.

While we shouldn’t throw public school rankings out the window, no one should rely on them 100%. We need a whole new public discourse on what good education is, and what it should look like in this country. When that finally happens public school rankings for k-12 general interest will be a balanced part of an entirely different conversation.




By: Patricia Hawke

Viewing Homework as an Educational Liability

November 28th, 2009

The value of homework has been questioned before. In fact there have been periods of time during the past 100 years when homework played a minimal role in schooling. Interestingly, homework, which is believed to improve learning and self-discipline, received two of its strongest promotions from a political concern, “Sputnik”, and an economic one, Japan’s business success. Each of these events brought an outcry that we were doing poorly as a nation because our educational systems were failing to produce competent adults. The answer, in part, was to intensify demands upon our students, which meant significant increases in homework. So our students now do about 50% more homework than they did just 20 years ago, while the USSR disintegrated and Japan has proven to be a paper tiger. In the meantime, decades of research on over a half-million students has failed to demonstrate that homework achieves any of its stated goals. Thirty-five years of working with children and schools has led me to conclude that homework impedes learning and is bad for the mental health of children and their families! It’s time for parents and educators to ask some hard questions.

A recent book, “The End of Homework” by Etta Kralovec and John Buell addresses these questions about the value of homework. In essence, they claim that it only serves to further the gap between students because of the severe inequalities of what families can offer as surrogate educational settings. Over 20% of our children are raised in homes below the poverty level. The gap between the haves and have-nots is increasing in our country. Poverty, along with the mother’s’ educational level, seem to be the strongest predictors of educational achievement. Making homework an important part of the educational process means many students are doomed from the start. In general, home is not a good setting for FORMAL learning. Today’s families are dominated by either two working parents or a single working parent. There is little time or energy to devote to the role of teacher. Conflict over homework is one of the prime sources of parent-child tension. This is a very serious concern when children are already experiencing marked reductions in family time.

We also face a society with a high divorce rate. Many children enter homes where there is chronic parental conflict and frequent transitions between two homes. What happens to homework on the night that the children are having their weekday dinner with father? At the same time parents are more anxious than ever about their children’s academic achievements. They are driven by another unsupported belief, that children with higher grades who end up going to better colleges will have more successful lives. Parents put pressure on teachers to give significant amounts of homework, believing that it’s good education.

Even where parents are able to commit the time required to monitor and assist with their children’s homework, there are additional major obstacles. First, the parent is usually dependent upon the child to acknowledge and explain the homework. It creates a different relationship, going from parent-child to teacher- student. Conflicts commonly ensue. In addition, most parents are not trained in teaching methods. Their way of doing an assignment may not match what is being taught in the classroom. By middle school, many parents are already challenged to understand the work. By high school, forget it! It is also a fuzzy line between helping a child and doing too much of the work. What a child brings to class may reflect significant parental effort or even help from a friend. This is one of the core problems with homework – the teacher has less control over and influence upon work done outside the school. The best setting for most schoolwork is in a school.

Does homework improve learning and build character? A recent article in Forbes magazine compared math scores in Japan, Canada, Germany, and the U.S. Scores on national tests indicated that beyond 1-2 hours of total homework, scores actually decreased in every country except Japan, where the scores were flat. More than 3 hours and the decrease was marked. Yet 24% of EIGHTH GRADERS in the U.S. already do more than three hours of homework a night! Forbes conclusion: The heavier the homework, the poorer the performance. A key reason for this may be the research indicating that our children, especially teens, are significantly sleep-deprived. Physicians are concerned about this as well as the increase in back problems from these students carrying overweight backpacks.

Most homework is either practicing something learned that day or pre-learning something for the next day. Many students get it right away and don’t need the practice. Many students don’t get it right away and need an educator to explain it to them, not a parent. Research has made it very clear that if students do assignments incorrectly and it’s not unlearned quickly, the wrong way becomes harder to change. It’s like the golfer who is taking lessons infrequently. The more times he plays and develops bad habits, the harder it is to correct.

This time-learning relationship touches on another major issue with homework. It is brutal to the lives of teachers, especially at middle and high school levels. Depending upon the subject matter, a teacher can face correcting hundreds of papers a night. No wonder many students do not get papers back the next day, especially exams or essays. This time gap is known to be harmful to the learning process but can we really fault teachers on this?

The notion that students who do their homework get better grades demonstrates the confusion between cause and correlation. Students who do their homework are generally more organized, stronger in language skills, eager to please, and/or very anxious to be successful. Most of this fits what I refer to as the “student personality.” They do their homework and get better grades, especially in high school where homework typically becomes a more significant part of grading, because it is natural for them to do so.

On the other hand, many students learn better by doing than listening, only do well in things that really interest them, prefer to challenge than to simply accept, and/or do better in more creative modes. These students have personalities that may be very successful in the real world but are not good fits for the traditional educational model. Some of these students blossom when transferred to a private school that is a better fit for them. Others blossom when they become adults and can choose work that fits who they are. Unfortunately many others have long since given up on themselves, believing they are stupid because they don’t fit the mold. Most high school dropouts point to falling behind in homework as the key factor in their failure and discouragement.

As for building character, many argue that the self-discipline and responsibility of doing homework prepares children for the real world. One of the problems here is the view that children are miniature adults and that there is a linear relationship between what children do and what they are like as adults. But this is not supported by research. Children have very different needs than adults. They learn by playing and socializing and experience a world that is constantly changing for them from the inside as well as the outside. They go through spurts of change, good and bad (from an adult’s perspective). Children develop their character in many ways in multiple settings. Not only is doing homework unproven as a means of building character, it robs children of time that could be spent doing other things that might have more influence on character, i.e., developing relationships with other children and adults. People fear that children will only spend more time watching TV or playing video games if given more free time. Another possibility is that children turn to these activities to crash because they are overloaded with isolating, draining mental tasks and have lost connections to their friends and the community around them.

I believe schoolwork should be done in school where there are the human and material resources to ensure that quality learning take place. Children then need time to be with friends, family, and involved in the community where they have much else of value to learn. This, of course, requires that all schools have equal resources and a different structure to the school day. Unfortunately this is not the case, especially in areas dominated by poverty-level families. This is one reason why schools in those communities that now provide longer days are reporting significant improvement in the skill levels of their students.




By: Kalman Heller

Economic Stimulus Package Plan

August 18th, 2009

The Taxpayer’s Dozen

There are 12 areas of the economic stimulus package plan:

Tax relief, child tax credit, jobless benefits, health care, energy, education, infrastructure, science and technology, law enforcement, jump start on jobs, business breaks and accountability. To Democrats, this plan represents stabilizing the economy where it will see the most progress – helping people help themselves. To Republicans, it is perceived as a huge loss of revenue where it will do big business and the military, two areas upon which Republicans base their version of financial stability.

A Networked Plan of Economic Stimulus

Unlike prior economic stimulus plans, i.e., millions to big business in 2001, tax cuts for the richest 1% and $350 billion to the bailout financial institutions, the Obama plan gets to the heart of why all other plans have failed…excising the middle class from benefiting in equal proportion. In the Obama plan, every area is carefully networked so that the results stabilize working class Americans. The middle class during the took several simultaneous hits taxes that incurred further debt, taxes on consumables and taxes that trickled down to create higher state income and property taxes. Allowing Americans to keep an additional $500-1,000 of their income reduces the burden of eroding paychecks and increasing costs of living. With added help from the child tax credit, working parents get to keep more of their hard-earned incomes if their salaries are under the $150,000 cap. So, the first two areas begin to immediately relieve the economic balloon about to burst from pressure of too many taxes at too high a rate. For those who are jobless as a result of economic layoff or job evaporation, the additional aid to jobless benefits may stave off the increase in the number of people living below the poverty level. Science &Technology, Law Enforcement, Jump Starting Jobs, Business breaks and accountability fit well into this network as definitely doable and pragmatic.

The Big Four of the Economic Stimulus Plan

There are 4 very big areas of this plan: Health care, energy, education and infrastructure. Health care, unless it is totally revamped will affect the outcome of all 11 related parts of this plan. Health care is unaffordable not only for average Americans but for business as well. Until that issue is resolved, none of the other areas of the plan can work. No job will be secure if health care continues to spiral out of control. No business will take the chance of hiring more employees they know will jeopardize the health care benefits of their existing staff. And, until age discrimination is resolved with regard to HMOs, older Americans who want to work past retirement will be considered undesirable and costly. The cost of education will increase as a result of increasing costs of benefits for education employees. Any revenues freed for other parts of the plan will be eroded by the cost of health care. Health care costs must be reined in before issuing revenue to education, energy and infrastructure. To overlook the ramifications of unaffordable health care is a serious loophole in the fabric of the economic stimulus plan.

For more information on the economic stimulus package, visit http://www.stimulus2.com.




By: John Parks